A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario that has attracted national interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed family members residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has developed right into a extremely publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek to make their family members property. The situation happens to be emblematic of wider disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, where progress pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting manufactured by their possible neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their preparing permission by creating a wall further than the boundaries in their site, leading to an encroachment on a Specific Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result locations are subject to rigid controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have Long lasting ecological penalties, notably in a sensitive coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their setting up permission, and say the wall, that is partly constructed, is in the right position. Their legal team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful development. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding so that you can protect their check out, an allegation which has been recurring in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of the sea are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable endeavours via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, according to sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Instances. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-large water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations, an image which includes since turn into emblematic of your intensity in the dispute. These steps weren't just symbolic; they have been meant to Acquire Visible evidence in the wall’s posture relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Situations reported, describing how The 2 Guys entered the water for the duration of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site grew to become Just about the most hanging descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely observed that this sort of actions were being cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being coated intimately from the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 became greatly searched phrases as audience sought to be familiar with the history and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on no matter whether interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute within the authorized timeline.
In the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement about boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as built, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has long been called meticulous in his assessment of preparing files, maps, and circumstances connected to your authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their action is enthusiastic by concern for environmental security and adherence to setting up law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting in its place that it is about guaranteeing that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their long-standing link to the region as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple simply seeking to make a spouse and children house in accordance with the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches over a Particular Place of Conservation and say that every one is effective are completed determined by Qualified suggestions and authorised ideas. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into the sea through a storm, usually do not change the underlying facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute in excess of building of wall at coastal site is becoming a shorthand description for a situation that lots of observers see as more and more widespread. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation in between private land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become far more contentious.
The Irish Situations posting about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced previously been involved with regional advocacy on preparing and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really distinct Expert backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in this kind of Accountant Paul Feely disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning through the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-large h2o through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of waistline-superior h2o through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Times are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting the two the Actual physical truth of the coastline plus the symbolic character on the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated determination; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an excessive method.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome stays unsure. The court will have to ascertain if the wall as created complies with scheduling authorization and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Area of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and scheduling situations. However the human ingredient remains central: neighbours who ought to Reside together with each other long following the authorized expenses are already paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around building performs at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend beyond that address. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the value of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. Furthermore, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when elementary troubles like environmental safety and property rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of organic magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. Regardless of whether it is going to in the end be altered, eliminated, or finished as planned will depend on the court docket’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely continue on to look in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.