A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours in excess of the development of the wall at a coastal internet site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier as well as Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design performs at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family members home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, where by development pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established people. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming built by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both residents of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their setting up authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their internet site, bringing about an encroachment over a Unique Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore parts are topic to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially constructed, is in the right place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which includes considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the water all through significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Just about the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders need to be granted to halt construction pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second while in the authorized timeline.
For the core from the dispute is actually a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as built, goes past what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by worry for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing connection to the realm as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair basically attempting to produce a family members property in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Particular Place of Conservation and say that every one operates are performed depending on Qualified information and authorized strategies. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea in the course of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the condition a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had previously been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of midsection-high water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom will have to determine whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning disorders. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to Reside alongside one another prolonged after the lawful prices are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction is effective at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will depend upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will possible continue on to look in headlines, linked indelibly to one of the most carefully viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.